Search

Search Results

• The ethical aspects of pseudoscience

  Komitet Etyki w Nauce Polskiej Akademii Nauk

• Ethics in specialist translation and competencies of interpreter – the case study

  Robert Boroch

• On what is important in the evaluation of articles, research projects, and examining degrees

  Jerzy Marian Brzeziński, Dariusz Doliński

• The Committee of Bioethics at Presidium of the Polish Academy of Sciences: its activity, function, and objectives

  Zbigniew Szawarski

• The Debates of the Task-Force Committees affiliated with Division One: Humanities and Social Sciences PAS: the Committee of Ethics in Science and the Committee on Science Studies (November 13, 2014, Warsaw)

  Debaty komitetów

• Ethics in research and impunity of anonymous reviewers

  Lilla Moroz-Grzelak

• More about anonymous reviewers. In response to the article of Professor Zbigniew Spendel

  Lilla Moroz-Grzelak

• Words versus facts

  Barbara Dolińska

• Giving opinions or shaping process? The experience of the Research Ethics Committee at the Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University

  Elżbieta Hornowska, Władysław Jacek Paluchowski

• Career paths in Polish academia: challenges and perspectives

  Anna Ajduk

• The report on the activity of the Commission on Ethics in Science in the year 2015

  Andrzej Zoll

• Infringement of copyright or violation of moral principles in science and depriving of an academic degree

  Andrzej Gomułowicz

• Commission for Research Integrity (CRI) Annual Report 2021

  Andrzej Górski, Mieczysław Grabianowski

• Ethical challenges of technoscience – information technologies

  Roman Z. Morawski

• Answer to Comments to the article “Five years of difficult experiences with the Act on the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes dated of January 15, 2015”

  Marta Gajewska, Joanna Gromadzka-Ostrowska, Jan Konopacki, Krzysztof Turlejski, Cezary W. Watała, Krzysztof Wąsowicz, Anna Wesołowska, Marek Wieczorek, Piotr Wlaź, Romuald Zabielski

• Critical comment on the paper „Five years of difficult experiences with the Act of the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes dated of January 15, 2015”

  Tomasz Pietrzykowski, Hanna Kalamarz-Kubiak

• Opinion on the proposal of the 9th December 2020 to amend The Law on Higher Education and Science (“the academic freedom” package)

  Komitet Etyki w Nauce Polskiej Akademii Nauk

• Rejoinder: About a (wrong) case study [Reply and disclaimer]

  Robert Boroch

• Knowledge alone is not everything... On values and responsibility of university

  Wiesław Banyś

• The report on the activity of the Commission on Ethics in Science in the year 2018

  Andrzej Górski, Mieczysław Grabianowski

• Challenges of science from the point of view of the National Science Center

  Małgorzata Kossowka

• The report on the activity of the Commission on Ethics in Science in the year 2017

  Andrzej Zoll

• The report on the activity of the Commission on Ethics in Science in the year 2015

  Andrzej Zoll

• Psychologist at university, in practice and among people – methodological, cultural and ethical determinants

  Jerzy Marian Brzeziński

• Five years of difficult experiences with the Act of the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes dated of January 15, 2015

  Małgorzata Gajewska, Joanna Gromadzka-Ostrowska, Jan Konopacki, Krzysztof Turlejski, Cezary W. Watała, Krzysztof Wąsowicz, Anna Wesołowska, Marek Wieczorek, Piotr Wlaź, Romuald Zabielski